ALARMING RATES OF BITE INJURIES IN THE BRAZILIAN JURISPRUDENCE – A SURVEY ON 1125 LAWSUITS DOCUMENTED OVER THE LAST 18 YEARS

Autores

  • Fernanda Silveira Vallim PUC-PR
  • Lívia Graziele Rodrigues Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás
  • Michelle Gouveia Benicio de Araújo
  • Érica Miranda de Torres Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás
  • Ademir Franco Department of Therapeutic Stomatology, Institute of Dentistry, Sechenov University, Russia
  • Rhonan Ferreira Silva Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás; Department of Legal Odontology and Forensic Anthropology, Scientific Police of Goiás

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21117/rbol.v6i1.192

Palavras-chave:

Forensic dentistry, Human bite, Jurisprudence, Lawsuits

Resumo

Introduction: Physical violence became an important global problem in the last decades. This scenario is reflected in the increasing jurisprudence. In specific situations, perpetrators and victims of physical violence may inflict an especial patterned injury named bitemark. Knowing the case characteristics in lawsuits involving human bites and bitemarks is important to understand and encourage the role of Forensic Dentists as expert witness for bitemark analysis in Court. Objectives: The present study aimed to assess the jurisprudence to screen lawsuits that involve human bites and bitemarks in order to extract characteristics that could support research and practice of bitemark analysis. Material and methods: A systematic search was conducted in an open access jurisprudence system with the keywords “bite” and “bitemark”. Full-texts of lawsuits were selected and underwent data extraction.  Results: A total of 2488 lawsuits were detected, from which 1125 were eligible in the present study. The lawsuits dated between 1997 (n=13, 1.15%) and 2015 (n=202, 17.95%). Forensic expertises were performed in 641 (56.97%) lawsuits, but the identity of suspects was investigated only in 3 (0.26%) cases.  Conclusions: An increasing trend of lawsuits involving human bites and bitemarks was observed. Forensic Dentists must be aware of the current bitemark scenario as well the limitations inherent to bitemark analysis to face casework in the field. The present study provides evidence to encourage major education in bitemark analysis.

Referências

World Health Organization. Violence. Available at: http://who.int/topics/violence/en; 2014. Accessed 14th of February 2017.

Dahlberg LL, Krug EG. Violence: a global public health problem. Cienc Saude Col. 2006; 11(2): 1163-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232006000200007

Mohamadian F, Hashemian A, Bagheri M, Direkvand-Moghadam A. Prevalence and risk factors of domestic violence against Iranian women: a cross section study. Korean J Fam Med. 2016; 37(4): 253-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2016.37.4.253

Silva LEL, Oliveira MLC. Epidemiological characteristics of violence against women in the Federal District, Brazil, 2009-2012. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016; 25(2): 331-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742016000200012

Rodrigues JL, Lima PA, Nagata JY, Rigo L, Cericato GO, Franco A et al. Domestic violence against children detected and managed in the routine of dentistry – a systematic review. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016; 43: 34-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.07.006

Silva LO, Souza-Silva BN, Rodrigues JLA, Rigo L, Cericato GO, Franco A et al. Identification and management of elder physical abuse in the routine of dentistry – a systematic review. Gerodontol. 2017; 34(1): 3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ger.12252.

Franco A, Willems G, Souza PHC, Coucke W, Thevissen P. Uniqueness of the anterior dentition three-dimensionally assessed for forensic bitemark analysis. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017; 46: 58-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.01.005

Maistry S, Phillips VM. Forensic dentistry case book 6: a self-inflicted bite mark: a case report. S Afr Dent J. 2016; 71(2): 76-77.

Singh SP, Aggarwal A, Kaur S, Singh D. Self inflicted human teeth bites: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2014; 19: 353. http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.19.353.4561

Senn DR, Weems RA. Manual of forensic odontology. 5th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.

Miranda-Rius J, Brunet-Llobet L, Lahor-Soler E, Mendieta C. An unexpected presentation of a traumatic wound on the lower lip: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014; 8: 298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-298

Martin-Fumadó C, Martínez-Zamora MA, Capella ET, Martínez-Román S, Castro AMT, Carmona F. Genital mutilation bite in gender-based violence. Rev Esp Med Legal. 2015; 41(1): 36-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reml.2014.08.002

Bastuq A, Kislak S, Mutlu NM, Akcaboy ZN, Koksal A, Sertcelik A, et al. Necrotizing fasciitis due to Streptococcus mitis caused by accidental human bite. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016; 10(1): 100-2. http://dx.di.org/10.3855/jidc.7040

Dorion RBJ. Bitemark evidence: a color atlas and text. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.

Guruge S, Jayasuriya-Illesinghe E, Gunawardena N, Perera J. Intimate partner violence in Sri Lanka: a scoping review. Ceylon Med J. 2015; 60(4): 133-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v60i4.8100

Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT et al. The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010.

Negre MC, Gil P. Valuation of the corporal damage by bites: decisions of the Audiencia Provincial de Castellón. Gac Int Sci Forense. 2012; 4: 43-57.

Herschaft EE, Alder ME, Ord DK, Rawson RD, Smith ES. Manual of forensic odontology. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.

Santos TS, Antunes AA, Carvalho RWF, Avelar RL, Melo REVA, Dourado E. Profile of patients presenting facial bite wounds: a retrospective study. Rev Gauc Odontol. 2007; 55(4): 369-73.

Reis CEF, Sá MES. Complications from human bites: teeth as lethal weapons. Rev Univ Val Rio Verde. 2013; 11(1): 156-66. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5892/ruvrv.2013.111.15616

Freeman AJ, Senn DR, Arendt DM. Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal disposition. J Forensic Sci. 2005; 50(6): 1436-43. http://dx.doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2005178

Garbin CAS, Garbin AJI, Dossi AP, Dossi MO. Domestic violence: an analysis of injuries in female victims. Cad Saude Pub. 2006; 22(12): 2567-73. http://dx.doi.org/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2006001200007

Johansen RJ, Bowers CM. Digital analysis of bite mark evidence using Adobe Photoshop. Santa Barbara: Forensic Imaging Services; 2000.

Naether S, Buck U, Campana L, Breitbeck R, Thali M. The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods. Int J Legal Med. 2012; 126(1): 89-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0580-7

Thali MJ, Braun M, Markwalder TH, Brueschweiler W, Zollinger U, Malik NJ et al. Bite mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/CAD support photogrammetry approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2003; 135(2): 115-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00205-6

Downloads

Publicado

2019-04-13

Edição

Seção

Artigo original