DIFICULDADES E LIMITAÇÕES DO USO DE ANÁLISE DE MARCAS DE MORDIDA EM ODONTOLOGIA FORENSE – UMA CARÊNCIA DE CIÊNCIA

Scheila Mânica

doi:10.21117/rbol.v3i2.8

Autores

Scheila Mânica Queen Mary University of London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21117/rbol.v3i2.8

Resumo

Introdução: O atual criticismo contra a análise de marcas de mordida tem subestimado um dos campos de maiores atuações do dentista forense. O motivo do criticismo tem um alto grau de severidade. Muitos inocentes foram erroneamente acusados e encarcerados devido análises de marcas de mordidas falhas e fracamente sustentadas pela ciência. Objetivo: Analisar criticamente questões importantes relacionadas à análise de marcas de mordidas e apresentar soluções. Conclusão: A análise de marcas de mordida não deve ser banida da Odontologia Forense, mas seu uso exige precaução. As metodologias de análises fortemente calcadas em ciência devem ser as únicas aceitas no futuro.

Referências

Pallam NK, Boaz K, Natrajan S, Raj M, Manaktala N, Lewis AJ. Computer-based method of bite mark analysis: A benchmark in forensic dentistry? J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(1):32-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.176944 .

Sirakova M, Debelle G. Identifying human bite marks in children. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2014; 24(12):550-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2014.07.010.

Pretty IA. Forensic dentistry: 2. Bitemarks and bite injuries. Dent Update. 2008;35(1):48-50, 3-4, 7-8 passim.

Dorion R. Bitemark Evidence: A Color Atlas and Text. New York: CRC Press; 2005.

DeVore DT. Bite marks for identification? A preliminary report. Medicine, science, and the law. 1971; 11(3):144-5.

Lewis C, Marroquin LA. Effects of skin elasticity on bite mark distortion. Forensic Sci Int. 2015; 257: 293-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.048.

Holtkötter H. Assessment of Bitemarks Transfer of Dental Patterns to Human Skin: Amsterdam University; 2012.

Metcalf R, Lee G, Gould L, Stickels J. Bite This! The Role of Bite Mark Analysis in Wrongful Convictions. The Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice. 2010; 7(1):47-64.

Bush MA. Forensic dentistry and bitemark analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142(9):997-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0307.

Clement JG, Blackwell SA. Is current bite mark analysis a misnomer? Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 201(1-3): 33-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.006.

Pretty IA, Sweet D. A paradigm shift in the analysis of bitemarks. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 201(1–3): 38-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.004.

Garrett B. Convicting the innocent: when criminal prosecutions go wrong. United States of America: Harvard University Press; 2011.

Rawson RD, Ommen RK, Kinard G, Johnson J, Yfantis A. Statistical evidence for the individuality of the human dentition. J Forensic Sci. 1984; 29(1):245-53.

Kieser JA, Bernal V, Neil Waddell J, Raju S. The uniqueness of the human anterior dentition: a geometric morphometric analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2007; 52(3):671-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00403.x.

Franco A, Willems G, Souza PH, Bekkering GE, Thevissen P. The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology. Int J Legal Med. 2015; 129(6): 1277-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1109-7.

Franco A. Unique or not unique? That is the question! RBOL. 2015; 2(2): 126-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21117/rbol.v2i2.36.

Layton JJ. Identification from a bite mark in cheese. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1966;6(2):76-80.

Bernitz H, Piper SE, Solheim T, Van Niekerk PJ, Swart TJ. Comparison of bitemarks left in foodstuffs with models of the suspects' dentitions as a means of identifying a perpetrator. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2000; 18(2):27-31.

McKenna CJ, Haron MI, Brown KA, Jones AJ. Bitemarks in chocolate: a case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2000; 18(1):10-4.

Aboshi H, Taylor JA, Takei T, Brown KA. Comparison of bitemarks in foodstuffs by computer imaging: a case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1994;12(2):41-4.

Webster G. A suggested classification of bite marks in foodstuffs in forensic dental analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 1982;20(1):45-52.

Ciapparelli L, Hughes P. Bite marks in tissue and in inanimate objects: analysis and comparison. In: Clark, DH. Ed Practical Forensic Odontology. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1992. p. 149-77.

Nambiar P, Carson G, Taylor JA, Brown KA. Identification from a bitemark in a wad of chewing gum. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2001; 19(1):5-8.

Sperber ND. Chewing gum-an unusual clue in a recent homicide investigation. Int J Orthod. 1981;19(2):7-8.

Nascimento M, Sarmento V, Beal V, Galvão L, Marques J. Identificação de indivíduos por meio das marcas de mordida em alimentos utilizando a engenharia reversa e a prototipagem rápida: caso simulado. Arq Odontol. 2012; 48:134-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.7308/aodontol/2012.48.3.03.

Daniel MJ, Pazhani A. Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015; 7(3):222-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.172442.

Sheasby DR, MacDonald DG. A forensic classification of distortion in human bite marks. Forensic Sci Int. 2001; 122(1):75-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00433-9.

Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Phillips LG. Langer's lines: to use or not to use. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(1):208-14.

Fonseca G, Farah M, Orellano-Blaskovich S. Bitemark analysis: Use of polyether in evidence collection, conservation, and comparison. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2009; 1(2):66-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2948.60376.

Weeratna JB. Are they dermatological lesions, bottle top burns or bite mark injuries? J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2014; 32(1):1-8.

Murmann DC, Brumit PC, Schrader BA, Senn DR. A comparison of animal jaws and bite mark patterns. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51(4):846-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00166.x.

Tedeschi-Oliveira SV, Trigueiro M, Oliveira RN, Melani RF. Intercanine distance in the analysis of bite marks: a comparison of human and domestic dog dental arches. The J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011;29(1):30-6.

Fonseca G, Mora E, Lucena J, Cantin M. Forensic studies of dog attacks on humans: a focus on bite mark analysis. Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science. 2015; 5:39-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRFMS.S92068.

Kemp A, Maguire SA, Sibert J, Frost R, Adams C, Mann M. Can we identify abusive bites on children? Arch Dis Child. 2006; 91(11):951.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.095463.

Singh SP, Aggarwal A, Kaur S, Singh D. Self inflicted human teeth bites: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2014; 19:353. http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.19.353.4561.

Sheasby DR, MacDonald DG. A forensic classification of distortion in human bite marks. Forensic Sci Int. 2001; 122(1):75-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00433-9.

Golden GS. Standards and practices for bite mark photography. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011; 29(2):29-37.

Maior J, Braga Netto A, Gomes R, Genú P. A aplicação da fotografia em marcas de mordida. International Journal of Dentistry. 2007; 6(1):21-4.

Chavez-Briones ML, Hernandez-Cortes R, Jaramillo-Rangel G, Ortega-Martinez M. Relevance of sampling and DNA extraction techniques for the analysis of salivary evidence from bite marks: a case report. Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14(3):10165-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.August.21.23.

Afsin H, Karadayi B, Cagdir SA, Ozaslan A. Role of bite mark characteristics and localizations in finding an assailant. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014; 6(3):202-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.137078.

Pretty IA. Development and validation of a human bitemark severity and significance scale. J Forensic Sci. 2007; 52(3):687-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00412.x.

Nuzzolese E, Di Vella G. The development of a colorimetric scale as a visual aid for the bruise age determination of bite marks and blunt trauma. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012; 30(2):1-6.

ABFO. Bitemark Methodology Standards and Guidelines. [Acessado em: 15/04/2016]; Disponível em: http://abfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ABFO-Bitemark-Standards-03162016.pdf.

Avon SL, Mayhall JT, Wood RE. Clinical and histopathological examination of experimental bite marks in-vivo. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2006; 24(2):53-62.

Chancellor A. Investigating Sexual Assault Cases. United States of America: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2012.

Sweet D, Pretty IA. A look at forensic dentistry - Part 2: Teeth as weapons of violence - identification of bitemark perpetrators. Br Dent J. 2001;190(8):415-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800990.

Verma AK, Kumar S, Bhattacharya S. Identification of a person with the help of bite mark analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013; 3(2):88–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.05.002.

Radford G, Kieser JA, Bernal V, Waddell JN, Forrest A. Biomechanical approach to human bitemark reconstruction. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2009; 27(1): 33-36.

Bhargava K, Bhargava D, Rastogi P, Paul M, Paul R, Jagadeesh H.G, et al. An overview of bite mark analysis. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2012; 34(1):61-6.

Aas J, Paster B, Stokes L, Olsen I, Dewhirst F. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(11):5721-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721-5732.2005.

Cheng E, Yoon A. Does Frye or Daubert matter? A study of scientific admissibility standards. Virginia Law Review. 2005; 91(472).

Stoney DA, Stoney PL. Critical review of forensic trace evidence analysis and the need for a new approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2015; 251:159-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.03.022.

DIFICULDADES E LIMITAÇÕES DO USO DE ANÁLISE DE MARCAS DE MORDIDA EM ODONTOLOGIA FORENSE – UMA CARÊNCIA DE CIÊNCIA

Autores

DOI:

Resumo

Referências

Downloads

Publicado

Edição

Seção

Licença

Informações

Desenvolvido por

Idioma

Enviar Submissão